On Sun, 30 May 1999, Daniel Quinlan wrote: > When the issue has come up, I've been pretty firm on the point that the > LSB sample implementation will only include LGPL or X-Consortium style > (or another license no more restrictive than either) licenses for > libraries.
So you're not going to include db 2.x? That will make compiling glibc interesting at best. > By the way, if you object to the policy of not accepting GPL libraries > in the LSB sample implementation, now is the time to let me know. It seems pretty unrealistic at best, unfortunately. Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | "For the next two hours, VH1 will be filled with foul-mouthed, | | crossdressing Australians. Viewer discretion is advised." | | | | Linux Application Development -- http://www.redhat.com/~johnsonm/lad |
