> Quite a while back, we agreed that applications should be built for a 386 > for portability. If an application used a feature of a more recent processor, > then it was responsible for checking and doing something appropriate if the > test failed.
In which case I don't think we need to worry about i386/i586/athlon/transmeta etc. Perhaps we should acquire an "optimised for:" and "cpu required:" in RPM or the tool the lsb chooses ?
