On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, James Dingwall wrote: > The current spec reads: > > The current "plan-of-record" is to specify RPM as the file format. It > is > supported either directly, or indirectly by the widest number of > distributions, and so far, no one has pointed out any deficiencies. > > I would suggest that while the actual format of the package is possibly > retained, it would be wise to change the actual extension from .rpm to .lsb > (for example). This will avoid confusion with the legacy packages that are > inevitably going to remain on the net.
.lsp (Linux Software Package) would be beter. Hugo. -- Hugo van der Kooij; Oranje Nassaustraat 16; 3155 VJ Maasland [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~hvdkooij/ -------------------------------------------------------------- Use of any of my email addresses for unsollicited (commercial) email is a clear intrusion of my privacy and illegal!
