Since use of clone() causes the pthreads implementation to be so different in many other areas bar the signalling (and in some opinions broken) would n't it be better to have a statement of future direction rather than standardising on this "broken/different" behavior for a threads implementation.
regards Andrew On Jan 3, 11:32am in "Re: Thread deficienc", [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Since the implementation of pthreads is not likely in the time frame of the > LSB specification, then a compromise might be to standardize on the > pthreads API's except for the POSIX signalling behaviour. The > specification could say that POSIX signalling is preferred; however, > "clone" would be temporarily allowed until the next revision of the LSB > specification. > > George Kraft IV > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 512-838-2688; t/l 678-2688 > Linux Technology Center > IBM, Austin Texas >
