Daniel Quinlan wrote: >> Anyway, would we adopt a subset of the rpm(8) command set because it >> accurately describes the functionality we want in lsb-install or would >> we adopt a subset of the RPM command set because lsb-install will just >> be a link or front-end to rpm(8) on RPM-based systems?
H. Peter Anvin writes: > Yes. Okay, do we know whether or not rpm(8) will ever change? It could cause problems in the latter case. Dan
