On Thu, Jun 29, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On 28 Jun 2000, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > > > > > > > /misc has the disadvantage of having nothing to do with what any > > > existing system uses. > > > > > > All of the ones I know either directly mount on subdirs of /, or mount > > > on subdirs of /mnt. > > > > > Debian uses /floppy and /cdrom, so /mnt is left alone. I have used it for > > several years, placing subdirectories within /mnt on which I mount the > > other partitions I add to root. These are permanent mounts set up in > > fstab, and I have never had any other software try to remount them, or > > overmount something on /mnt. > > Yes. This contradict what I said. Debian uses subdirectories of /. > Red Hat and Solaris and Irix use subdirectories of /mnt. I have no
This is wrong. Red Hat uses /mnt. Solaris 7 has /cdrom and uses /vol for the volume manager. I'm not sure about Irix, but as far as I know they also don't use subdirectories in /mnt. Thorsten -- Thorsten Kukuk http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE GmbH Schanzaeckerstr. 10 90443 Nuernberg Linux is like a Vorlon. It is incredibly powerful, gives terse, cryptic answers and has a lot of things going on in the background.
