Hi, On Tue, Dec 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 00:18:41 -0500 > From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Good point. The original place which I had suggested was > /etc/init.d/lsb-init-functions, but some folks objected to this on a > number of grounds (a) they didn't like it in /etc, and (b) > lsb-init-functions isn't an actual init.d script, but rather a fragment > of one. > > Does anyone care to suggest another location? > > No one has commented, so I'll offer a few suggestions: > > /lib/lsb/init-functions > /etc/init.d/lsb-init-functions > /etc/lsb-init-functions > > If no one comments, I'll choose /lib/lsb/init-functions. That seems to > make the most amount of sense. Yes, please use /lib/lsb/init-functions > > 2. killproc basename [signal] and pidofproc basename: > > Can we replace basename with "path" ? If we have the full path > to a program it is much easier and safer to identify the right > process. > > This seems reasonable to me, although it's a change from what the > SysVinit package does. Comments? > > I've heard no comments on this either. If someone thinks this is a bad > idea, speak now or forever hold your peace.... > > - Ted -- Thorsten Kukuk http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE GmbH Schanzaeckerstr. 10 90443 Nuernberg Linux is like a Vorlon. It is incredibly powerful, gives terse, cryptic answers and has a lot of things going on in the background.
