On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Christopher Yeoh wrote: > Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:44:14 +1000 > From: Christopher Yeoh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Johannes Poehlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: URGENT [PROPOSAL] V3: lsb lib and lsb loader location (also > IA64) > Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 02:54:59 +0200 > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Johannes Poehlmann writes: > > > > > lsb libraries native for this architecture > > runtime libraries -> /lib/lsb > > Stub libraries -> /usr/lib/lsb-stub > > > > IA32 emulation libraries on non IA32 systems (IA64) > > runtime libraries -> /lib/lsb-ia32compat > > Stub libraries -> /usr/lib/lsb-stub-ia32compat > > Is there any need to embed the `ia' bit in the name? Why not just > /lib/lsb32 (or /lib/lsb32compat though I don't think we even need the > compat suffix). The same directories can then be used for sparc64 and > ppc64 systems (no need to install both ia32 and ppc32 libraries on the > same machine). yes, indeed on ia64 /lib/lsb32 is a better name. I agree, it's simpler
Luigi
