On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 10:18:33AM -0400, Brent Verner wrote: > | If I have scripts /etc/init.d/foo and /etc/init.d/bar in my .lsb > | package (with names allocated by LANANANANANA [0]), can I just put a "# > | Required-Start: foo" in bar, or do I also need a "# Provides: foo" in foo? > you must have a Provides: line if the script Provides a facility > that any other script Requires, otherwise, how is the dependency > to be resolved?
By looking at the name of the script. ``Facility names may also be init.d script names'' -- it's just not clear if that means that init.d script names *are* facility names, or if it's merely okay to use the same names twice, independently. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.'' -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
