> Each command should be compared with SuSv2 or POSIX, and if an argument > or behavior is extraneous, careful thought should be put into leaving it > in LSB.
Please go and read the LSB mission statement and the original mailing list discussions first. > To do otherwise places an unrealistic burden on implementors of embedded > and otherwise small systems. Please go and read the old LSB archives. This is a long old discussion > Does a standard Linux implementation of /bin/cat really require > supporting --number-nonblank and --squeeze-blank and --show-nonprinting? > Please go and read the old LSB archives. This is a long old discussion > I humbly urge members and readers to reconsider this course of action. > As it stands, LSB is currently not a standards document but really a > common-practices document. Guess what, thats what the whole bloody idea is. But if you'd actually bothered to read before writing you'd have known that. Alan
