At 2002/3/4 12:53-0700 Matt Taggart writes: > > is appropriate for the normative parts of a standards). > > I agreee. While the FHS has done a good job including rationale in > their spec, I think the rationale for the LSB will be much longer > and warants a separate document. >
I prefer the suggestion that someone made where we can build the spec with or without the rationale (and perhaps the rationale without the spec). At a minimum I think we should be able to mark the spec in the places where there is a rationale available in a separate document. Chris -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group Canberra, Australia
