There is a POSIX interpretation which said the requirement stands. If i recall correctly, UnixWare implementated a strategy that meets both the specification and the security requirement.
On May 21, 1:10pm in "Re: vsx-pcts tests f", Dave Prosser wrote: > > I could swear that there's already an interpretation (or the like) > for that test since we've had the same security fix in UnixWare's > tmpfile() for years now. This isn't new. > regards Andrew
