hi Matt , On Aug 16, 9:01am in "Re: LSB.fhs failure ", Andrew Josey wrote: > > /tset/LSB.fhs/usr/x11r6/x11r6-tc 2 > > "The symbolic link /usr/bin/X11 shall exist and point to /usr/X11R6/bin" > > On Debian it looks like "/usr/bin/X11 -> ../X11R6/bin" Is this acceptable? > > Fix the test? > I looked into this further and the test should tolerate this sort of symlink, indeed on my test machine (RedHat 7.1) it has the same symlink and the test passes. We'll need to do further investigations on Debian regards Andrew
- Re: LSB.fhs failure digest for Debian Sample Implementation Andrew Josey
- Re: LSB.fhs failure digest for Debian Sample Implement... M. Drew Streib
- Re: LSB.fhs failure digest for Debian Sample Imple... Andrew Josey
- Re: LSB.fhs failure digest for Debian Sample I... Anthony Towns
- Re: LSB.fhs failure digest for Debian Samp... Andrew Josey
- Re: LSB.fhs failure digest for Debian... Anthony Towns
- Re: LSB.fhs failure digest for De... Andrew Josey
- sendmail requirements (was Re: LSB.fhs fa... Andrew Josey
- Re: LSB.fhs failure digest for Debian Sample Implement... Matt Taggart
- Andrew Josey
