George Kraft IV writes: > or application would mean that the suppiler makes a social testimonial > to the Linux community. The supplier states, without endorsement > from the LSB or FSG, that to their knowledge their deliverable, at the > time of its release, follows the LSB standard. > > Specifically for Linux distributions: > > 1) follows the LSB written specification > 2) passes the binary LSB TET test suite provide by the LSB > 3) passes the binary lsblibchk, lsbdevchk
Distributions shouldn't have to pass lsbdevchk unless they want to claim being able to create LSB compliant applications with their distribution (ie they've implemented a build environment). Chris. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group Canberra, Australia
