Stew Benedict writes: > > I've tried both by just linking /lib/ld-lsb.so.1 to /lib/ld-linux.so.2 and > with a set of lsb libraries in place, with the same result. The > journal/report doesn't show anything unusual for these other than the test > fails. Any suggestions?
I've had a look at this and it appears to be a bug caused by the way the test suites are compiled (using lsbdev). One of the utilities for the usersgroups test suite uses getspnam which is not an LSB interface. This is true for a few binaries in the test suite and to get around it I compiled those specific interfaces statically. Unfortunately this doesn't appear to work properly for getspnam. If no one else has a better idea then we'll probably have to compile this utility with getspnam dynamically linked (which of course will mean its not LSB compliant). In practice I don't envisage any compatability problems with this approach. Comments anyone? Chris -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group Canberra, Australia
