The test does a setlogmask(LOG_MASK(LOG_DEBUG|LOG_WARNING)). This does not seem to be a valid way to call LOG_MASK in glibc; I don't know about POSIX. glibc wants it to be called like this: setlogmask(LOG_MASK(LOG_DEBUG)|LOG_MASK(LOG_WARNING))
Note that the log priorities are numbered, 0 through 7, and are so not directly or'able. That's why LOG_MASK exists, no? openlog_L calls setlogmask in the same way. -- see shy jo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
