FYI, we have some LSB-SI tests results for someone to take a look at. George (gk4)
"Wichmann, Mats D" wrote: > > For reference purposes, I've uploaded > a tarball to the incoming directory > on freestandards.org called: > > results.newsi.tar.bz2 > > This tarball contains the results of > a test run against the LSB-si I built > on Tuesday, with all new packages. > > There are two test runs; the first one > has all the syslog-related tests missing > because I'd gotten syslog set up wrong, > so the second run is with a secenario > file that tested only those syslog tests. > > Hopefully we can recruit someone to take a > look at the relatively short list of failures. > > ================================================ > > The si itself should hopefully be > reproducible from these bits: > > in the incoming directory, si-new-mats.tar > contains the xml build area. I belive > this is updated to match Stuart's > recent checkins but I haven't tested > it since those got folded in. > > in the pub/lsb/impl directory, a > rollup tarball lsbsi-new-pkgs.020710.tar > which contains the "packages" directory > it was built against. > > The only oddball thing in there is > the ncurses package, which is ncurses-5.2 > with an April-2002 rollup patchset already > applied, since I didn't find just one > simple patch that could be applied against > the "stock" ncurses package. > > Enjoy, or ignore (I hope it's the former, > of course). > > Mats > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- George Kraft IV [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
