On 13-Jul-2002 Andrew Josey wrote: > On Jul 12, 2:42pm in "RE: lsblibchk 1.2.2-", Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: >> >> I wanted to note the issue, I can solve it locally (-; > > Yes it was a tricky one since we want to encourage conforming > apps before there are systems out there with the default linker. > Perhaps a future package should contain > two versions of the binary and install a version dependent > on the linker found.
Or you could simply have a -lsb version which expects the ld-lsb.so. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
