Hi guys, That's also fine for me.
Regards. Le 20 nov. 2014 12:55, POISSON Frédéric < [email protected]> a écrit : > Hello Raphaël, > > I have no objection for removing this optimization. But if there is some, > this optimization and the way to use the "ldap." and "srcLdap." should be > documented if they are used inside an external script file. > > Regards, > > Le 20/11/14 11:42, *Raphaël Ouazana-Sustowski * < > [email protected]> a écrit : > > Hi, > > When using scripts in LSC, ldap and srcLdap bindings are only added if > the strings "ldap." and "srcLdap." can be found in the script. > Is this a really needed optimization? I don't think the cost of > systematically adding these binding can penalize performance, but I > didn't test the actual effect. > > If there is no objection, I will remove this optimization, allowing to > fix easily #734. > > Regards, > Raphaël Ouazana. > _______________________________________________________________ > Ldap Synchronization Connector (LSC) - http://lsc-project.org > > lsc-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lsc-project.org/listinfo/lsc-dev > > -- > > *Frederic Poisson* > > > > _______________________________________________________________ > Ldap Synchronization Connector (LSC) - http://lsc-project.org > > lsc-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lsc-project.org/listinfo/lsc-dev > >
_______________________________________________________________ Ldap Synchronization Connector (LSC) - http://lsc-project.org lsc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lsc-project.org/listinfo/lsc-dev
