Hi Dirk,

My memory has faded somewhat on Forwarding Adjacency (FA) implementation. 
However, since basic MPLS LSPs are unidirectional, doesn’t the SPF two-way 
check have to be disabled anyway? If so, the Remote Interface ID doesn’t matter.

Thanks,
Acee

From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of "Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - 
BE/Antwerp)" <dirk.goeth...@nokia.com>
Date: Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 11:06 AM
To: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: [Lsr] advertising tunnels in IGP

Hi,
In OSPFv2 (and ISIS), we can add (RSVP) tunnels to the topology
by adding them as a unnumbered link in the router lsa.
In OSPFv3, we can only add a link to the router-lsa if the neighbor
interface ID is known.
So it looks like we can only add a tunnel to the OSPFv3 topology,
if we first exchanging hello packets over the tunnel.
Is that correct?
As this is not needed in the other IGPs, do
we have other possibilities?
Thx,
Dirk



_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to