Hi Acee,

According to our logs, although we made individual registrations through the 
early allocation process, it looks like all of the RFC 7684 registries at 
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospfv2-parameters were created in September 
2015, after the document was approved by the IESG. 

Amanda

On Tue Jul 24 20:54:52 2018, a...@cisco.com wrote:
> Hi Amanda,
> 
> It seems to me that we created the RFC 7684 TLV registry via early
> allocation so that we could allocate code points from other drafts.
> 
> If this is, in fact, the case, we'll need to manage the IGP MSD Type
> in the WG.
> 
> Thanks,
>  Acee
> 
> On 7/24/18, 4:25 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT" <iana-questi...@iana.org>
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Acee,
> 
> We actually aren't able to create registries through the RFC 7120
> early allocation process. We'll have to hold off until the IESG
> notifies us that they've approved the document for publication.
> 
> Best regards,
> Amanda
> 
> On Tue Jul 24 14:50:47 2018, a...@cisco.com wrote:
> > Hi Amanda, et al,
> >
> > Can we get the registry for “IGP MSD Types” created as well? We now
> > have another draft allocating a code point. The IS-IS TLVs have
> > already been allocated through the early allocation process.
> >
> > Hi Authors,
> >
> > Please change “MSD Types” to “IGP MSD Types” in the IANA section
> > consistent with other registries in the “Interior Gateway Protocol
> > (IGP) Parameters” registry grouping.
> >
> > https://www.iana.org/assignments/igp-parameters/igp-
> > parameters.xhtml#igp-algorithm-types
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Acee
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to