Hi Peter, Martin,
We can address these comments after the draft is IESG approved and on the RFC
Editor queue as long as they don't change the normative specifications. I'm
hoping this simple and draft which has an existing implementation will be
approved.
Thanks,
Acee
On 10/25/18, 4:54 AM, "Peter Psenak (ppsenak)" <ppse...@cisco.com> wrote:
Hi Martin,
I have addressed your comment, bu I'm unable to publish the updated
version at this point as the submission is closed till November 3rd.
thanks,
Peter
On 23/10/18 11:15 , Martin Vigoureux wrote:
> Martin Vigoureux has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-08: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hello,
>
> thank you for this document. I have only one comment which is picking up
a typo:
>
> s/a way to advertise and use and use them for Generalized Multi-/a way to
> advertise and use them for Generalized Multi-/
>
>
> .
>
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
