Hi Ben, On 10/25/18, 8:22 AM, "Benjamin Kaduk" <ka...@mit.edu> wrote:
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Sending a new type of information to the peer usually involves a privacy considerations analysis. I don't expect there to be anything worrisome here, but some text in the document indicating that the analysis has been done would be reassuring. Can you suggest some text? I was thinking: Since the scope of the interface ID is limited to the advertising OSPF router uniquely identifying links, there are no privacy concerns associated with its advertisement. Thanks, Acee _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr