Thanks Qin. I skimmed the diff and this looks like a good step up. Thanks.
Adrian -----Original Message----- From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Qin Wu Sent: 03 September 2019 12:03 To: lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-02.txt The v-02 is posted to address remaining comments on the list, thanks Adrain, Aijun, Les for comments and input. The diff is: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-02 -Qin -----邮件原件----- 发件人: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 internet-dra...@ietf.org 发送时间: 2019年9月3日 18:58 收件人: i-d-annou...@ietf.org 抄送: lsr@ietf.org 主题: I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-02.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF. Title : IGP extension for PCEP security capability support in the PCE discovery Authors : Diego R. Lopez Qin Wu Dhruv Dhody Michael Wang Daniel King Filename : draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-02.txt Pages : 9 Date : 2019-09-03 Abstract: When a Path Computation Element (PCE) is a Label Switching Router (LSR) participating in the Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP), or even a server participating in IGP, its presence and path computation capabilities can be advertised using IGP flooding. The IGP extensions for PCE discovery (RFC 5088 and RFC 5089) define a method to advertise path computation capabilities using IGP flooding for OSPF and IS-IS respectively. However these specifications lack a method to advertise PCEP security (e.g., Transport Layer Security(TLS), TCP Authentication Option (TCP-AO)) support capability. This document proposes new capability flag bits for PCE-CAP-FLAGS sub-TLV that can be announced as attribute in the IGP advertisement to distribute PCEP security support information. In addition, this document updates RFC 5088 and RFC 5089 to allow advertisement of Key ID or Key Chain Name Sub-TLV to support TCP AO security capability. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-02 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-02 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-02 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ I-D-Announce mailing list i-d-annou...@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
