Hi Tom, I agree with your comments. I'm going to start a WG adoption poll on this document as it is pretty straight-forward. See one inline.
On 11/24/19, 2:44 AM, "Lsr on behalf of tom petch" <lsr-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of ie...@btconnect.com> wrote: Christian Some stray thoughts /intermediate system routeing/intermediate system routing/ since we have to use the American style:-( We sometimes violate this rule if it is a direct reference to an ISO document of a text lifted directly from ISO specification. However, the two instances are not so I'd recommend, "Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) routing" for both references. Thanks, Acee import ietf-routing { prefix "rt"; } lacks a reference clause and the reference should be in the Normative References import ietf-isis { prefix "isis"; } lacks a reference clause IS-IS reverse metric functionality [RFC8500]. YANG module must be plain text and this looks like it is not. Tom Petch _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr