Ack. well, problem real, problem being solved, I would prefer WG getting ahead of the problem while it is being solved rather than standardizing whatever ends up already deployed in retrospective :-} We'll gladly present a draft update in 2nd session (if Chris doesn't chime in, count me in pls)
As to flood parameters, the whole pressing is coming from usual 3-4 IGP people generating all the noise all of a sudden ;-) AFAIS but yeah, it's worth possibly to say something, my opinion there is basically Les's take + Chris B's take that we could benefit from a configurable constant advertised to sender. But longish, mildly productive discussion thread amongst those 3-4 people has been had so 'nuff said ;-) thanks --- tony On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 1:57 PM Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com> wrote: > While I never concluded the discussion (until now), but there is very > little support for the requirement from operators. The flooding reflector > draft did have the most support with support from one operator who was not > a co-author on the draft. We could move these presentations to the second > session and the flood parameters to the first session. However, given the > paucity of support, I think the direction on flooding parameters is much > more pressing and deserves more time. At the same time, I don’t see a > problem with updates on the drafts as long as the drafts themselves have > been updated. > > > > Thanks, > > Acee > > > > *From: *Tony Przygienda <tonysi...@gmail.com> > *Date: *Tuesday, March 24, 2020 at 8:58 PM > *To: *Alvaro Retana <alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com> > *Cc: *"lsr-cha...@ietf.org" <lsr-cha...@ietf.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" < > lsr@ietf.org>, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigour...@nokia.com>, Yingzhen Qu > <yingzhen...@futurewei.com>, Chris Bowers <cbow...@juniper.net> > *Subject: *Re: [Lsr] Agenda Posted Re: Link State Routing (lsr) WG > Virtual Meeting: 2020-04-02 > *Resent-From: *<alias-boun...@ietf.org> > *Resent-To: *Acee Lindem <a...@cisco.com>, Yingzhen Qu < > yingzhen.i...@gmail.com>, Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> > *Resent-Date: *Tuesday, March 24, 2020 at 8:58 PM > > > > any chance people can post invite.ics I cn import into my agenda? it's > really tedious with the timezones & every group announcing the time in > different way ;-) > > > > Having said that, if we present this topic we could plug in > draft-przygienda-lsr-flood-reflection > update preso in case Chris wants to do it (for me it's 6am in the morning > so I pass). We had an update with readability comments and also some > procedure/format clarifications. Yes, I think on the list there were > voices supporting work in this area & backing this draft. From our side we > see that it 1. works & 2. seems to solve a problem for several customers > within the parameters they set. > > > > --- tony > > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 3:15 PM Alvaro Retana <alvaro.ret...@futurewei.com> > wrote: > > On March 24, 2020 at 1:42:29 PM, Yingzhen Qu wrote: > > > [Speaking as a WG participant.] > > > > Now we have two interim sessions scheduled, please find updated agenda > here: > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2020-lsr-01/materials/agenda-interim-2020-lsr-01-lsr-01.html > > > > > If there is any question, please let us know. > > > Dear Chairs: > > Hi! > > > I have a question, perhaps an early agenda bash. > > The agenda includes presentations of the Area Proxy/TTZ drafts [*]. > > Acee had sent a message to the WG "asking whether there is a really a > strong requirement to advance one or more of these documents" [1]. I saw a > couple of replies on the list supporting this type of work, but I didn't > see a discussion related to what specific requirements/issues/"places in > the network" should be addressed. > > What was the conclusion of the thread? Are we ready to start/continue > discussing the drafts? > > > Thanks! > > Alvaro. > > > [*] Disclaimer: I am an author on the TTZ draft -- cc'ing Martin just in > case an AD is needed at this early stage. > > [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/Dc1YZd6KgKrwx3ooqLcdW3C6qPY/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
