Deborah Brungard has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-isis-te-app-17: Abstain
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-te-app/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for resolving my discuss on aligning SR terms with SPRING's work. I remain unconvinced on backward compatibility with RSVP-TE, hence my abstain ballot. Similar to other operators, I have serious concerns with operational aspects and the unfair burden placed on operators. A simple on/off control would have provided a much more elegant solution. >From the discussion, this is obviously a multi-vendor agreement on their preferred way, so while I disagree, I will not stand in the way. _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
