Dear Chris,
On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 4:44 AM Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> wrote: > > > > On Jul 10, 2020, at 7:07 PM, Uma Chunduri <umac.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I would support the IS-IS TTZ solution for WG adoption. > > > > Of course, obviously not with OSPF encodings or concepts only relevant > to OSPF (thx for the updated version). > > Thanks for the good work which was started way back on TTZs with OSPF > protocol first (RFC 8099). > > Has RFC8099 been deployed by anyone? > The simple answer is I don't know. I would let the authors of 8099 speak up who might know about the deployment status and how this experimental RFC helped. I also believe this question is more relevant if there is a BIS document for the same as discussed in the list for further enhancements and possible deployment experience (as it's possible who is using this and might not be active here). -- Uma C. > I would be very interested in hearing from operators who have experience > with TTZ since RFC8099 has been around for over 3 years now. >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
