Robert – Both OSPF and IS-IS have area identifiers which are advertised. Why would we need to invent another identifier for an area?
Les From: Robert Raszuk <rob...@raszuk.net> Sent: Monday, August 03, 2020 10:31 AM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsb...@cisco.com> Cc: bruno.decra...@orange.com; tony...@tony.li; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-02.txt Les, > But currently the draft is defining a SID which is NOT associated with a > prefix. + > But if the proposal is to use a SID associated with a prefix then I see no > need to invent a new SID advertisement. How about we first define an "Area Prefix" (IP address being a property of an area) then assign SID to it ? - - - How odd it may sound I would like to still be able to direct traffic (read ip tunnel) traffic to an area without any SID. Thx, R.
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
