Les, > The statement “the … Prefix SID does NOT have the semantics that we want and > causes deleterious side-effects” is FALSE.
Ahem. I disagree. No need to be rude about it. > There is an alternative here: > > Given that there isn’t any defined use case for the Area Prefix/SID, you > could choose to defer its definition until such time as a use case arises. > I agree that the concept is appealing and is potentially useful – which is > why I thought it worthwhile to invest time in defining it. But a conservative > approach might be to wait until we actually need it before defining it. It is > always possible that when the use case arises we will find that there are > some other issues which have been overlooked which might alter how this would > be advertised. You’ve heard two of our customers here on the list tell you that they want this. Therefore, we’re going to ship it. Tony
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
