On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 6:27 AM Aijun Wang <wangai...@tsinghua.org.cn> wrote:
> Hi, Tony: > > Aijun Wang > China Telecom > > On Nov 20, 2020, at 17:45, Tony Przygienda <tonysi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yes, acknowledging the idea of negative disaggregation is inspired by RIFT > work is fine (and normally, when inspired by an idea at least in research > cycles it is considered basic courtesy to refer to the according source, > something has been lost more and more in IETF over time I dare to observe > which in itself reflects on the community IMO) but please do not try to > compare the two beyond that. > > [WAJ] PUA has no relation with RIFT. I have not yet study what’s problem > it encountered, but welcome the experts have such design experience to > point out the pitfall that PUA can bypass. > > aha, ok, I just chimed in because I saw people somehow implying a map of RIFT negative disaggregation in relation to this work but if this is a completely different mechanism than I just watch from the sidelines thanks -- tony
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
