Yes, I think that would be useful. On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 8:42 AM Tony Li <tony...@tony.li> wrote:
> > > On May 24, 2021, at 8:39 AM, Anoop Ghanwani <an...@alumni.duke.edu> wrote: > > I thought that it might help operators and vendors think about > these components. > > > > > I would have no objection to simply enumerating the possibilities and > noting the consistency requirement. > > Tony > > > > On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 8:33 AM Tony Li <tony...@tony.li> wrote: > >> >> >> On May 24, 2021, at 8:27 AM, Anoop Ghanwani <an...@alumni.duke.edu> >> wrote: >> >> I think it might be a good idea if the draft mentioned what delay(s) >> "SHOULD" be used. >> >> >> Why? >> >> It seems like this is local to a domain. The network administrator is >> free to do as he sees fit and include whatever parameters make sense to >> them. As long as the network is self-consistent, that should operate >> correctly. >> >> Tony >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
