Peter, 

draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-17 currently has registered Algorithm Types 128-255 
with IANA. 
If we need to add a new Algorithm Type, e.g. using a weighted value of a Stub 
Link property in calculating the shortest path, do we need to use one of the 
value within 128-255 or need to ask IANA to assign one of the values within 
2-127 (currently shown unassigned on IANA page)?

Linda Dunbar

-----Original Message-----
From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Peter Psenak
Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 7:52 AM
To: bruno.decra...@orange.com; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo

Hi Bruno,

On 09/09/2021 14:43, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
> Hi authors, all,
> 
> I have a question related to the two-way connectivity check performed on each 
> link during the FlexAlgo SPF.

flex-algo is defined as set of:

(a) calculation-type
(b) metric-type,
(c) a set of constraints

Two way connectivity check for any link in the MT topology is orthogonal to 
flex-algo and is done once only and used for all algorithms.

Flex-algo calculation using (a), (b), and (c) is done on top of MT topology 
using only links for which the 2WCC has already been performed.


> 
> Is this point documented in the document? I could not find it so far.
> If not, what is the (reverse connectivity) check that need to be performed on 
> the reverse link?


none.

thanks,
Peter


> 
> A priori I could see multiple options:
> a) link exist
> b) link exist with a standard IGP metric  (seem the option defined in the ISO 
> spec §7.2.8.2)
> c) link exist with the FlexAlgo metric used by FlexAlgo
> d) link exist with the FlexAlgo metric used by FlexAlgo and link complies to 
> FlexAlgo constraints.
> 
> I think we'll agree that this point requires uniformity across nodes hence 
> standardization.
> 
> Personally, I don't have significant preference, but the algo defined in §13 
> "Calculation of Flexible Algorithm Paths" could be read as defining option 
> "d" (as links not following the constraints are "pruned from the 
> computation") but I'm not sure that this is intended for the two-way 
> connectivity check.
> 
> Thanks,
> Regards,
> --Bruno
> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu 
> ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
> falsifie. Merci.
> 
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
> information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
> this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
> modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flsr&amp;data=04%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7C2504ea39e2e94976a95908d97390b485%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637667887645570581%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=bHrwW7VJ2L1SXk6Jz%2BXZRW9%2FRUB9Z8BpqzLI6fXyeBA%3D&amp;reserved=0
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flsr&amp;data=04%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7C2504ea39e2e94976a95908d97390b485%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637667887645570581%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=bHrwW7VJ2L1SXk6Jz%2BXZRW9%2FRUB9Z8BpqzLI6fXyeBA%3D&amp;reserved=0

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to