The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8665, "OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing".
-------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6838 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Praveen Kumar <pravk...@cisco.com> Section: 6.1 Original Text ------------- B-Flag: Backup Flag. If set, the Adj-SID refers to an adjacency that is eligible for protection (e.g., using IP Fast Reroute or MPLS-FRR (MPLS-Fast Reroute) as described in Section 2.1 of [RFC8402]. Corrected Text -------------- B-Flag: Backup Flag. If set, the Adj-SID refers to an adjacency that is eligible for protection (e.g., using IP Fast Reroute or MPLS-FRR (MPLS-Fast Reroute) as described in Section 3.4 of [RFC8402]. Notes ----- I don't see any section 2.1 in RFC 8402. Reference of section 2.1 of RFC 8402 seems incorrect. It should be section 3.4 as per my understanding. Kindly fix it if possible. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8665 (draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-27) -------------------------------------- Title : OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing Publication Date : December 2019 Author(s) : P. Psenak, Ed., S. Previdi, Ed., C. Filsfils, H. Gredler, R. Shakir, W. Henderickx, J. Tantsura Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
