Hi Hannes,

Thank you.  Not everyone is yet in agreement with this, so we are discussing 
correct wording.

T


> On Jul 5, 2022, at 7:00 AM, Hannes Gredler 
> <hannes=40gredler...@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Tony, et al,
> 
> minor nit:
> 
> ---
>   As an example, consider the Extended IS Reachability TLV (type 22).
>   A neighbor in this TLV is specified by:
> 
>   *  7 octets of system ID and pseudonode number
>   *  3 octets of default metric
> 
>   This acts as the key for this entry.  The key is followed by up to
>   244 octets of sub-TLV information.
> ---
> 
> I believe that in most implementations the key in the LSDB is the 7 octets of 
> system ID and pseudonode number
> and does not include the metric (it's really an attribute to the key), 
> whereas the current wording might
> wrongly imply that the key is {sysid, PSN and metric}.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> /hannes
> 
> |    From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org <mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf 
> Of Tony Li
> |    Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2022 3:09 AM
> |    To: lsr <lsr@ietf.org <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>>
> |    Subject: [Lsr] Fwd: New Version Notification for
> |    draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-01.txt
> | 
> |     
> | 
> |     
> | 
> |    Hi all,
> | 
> |     
> | 
> |    This is an update to reflect some of the discussions to date. A diff is
> |    attached.  Most of this is a change to terminology to stop using the word
> |    ‘instance’ and shift to using ‘multi-part TLV’.
> | 
> |     
> | 
> |    We have been having a discussion about adding more discussion of keys in
> |    this document.  We have not done that yet.  This is not an indication of
> |    refusal, just making one baby step forward.  More to come… Text
> |    contributions are more than welcome.
> | 
> |     
> | 
> |    Other comments?
> | 
> |     
> | 
> |    Regards,
> | 
> |    Tony
> | 
> |     
> | 
> |     
> | 
> |     
> | 
> |     
> | 
> |      Begin forwarded message:
> | 
> |       
> | 
> |      From: internet-dra...@ietf.org <mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org>
> | 
> |      Subject: New Version Notification for
> |      draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-01.txt
> | 
> |      Date: July 4, 2022 at 6:04:37 PM PDT
> | 
> |      To: "Antoni Przygienda" <p...@juniper.net <mailto:p...@juniper.net>>, 
> "Chris Bowers"
> |      <cbo...@juniper.net <mailto:cbo...@juniper.net>>, "Les Ginsberg" 
> <ginsb...@cisco.com <mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com>>, "Parag
> |      Kaneriya" <pkane...@juniper.net <mailto:pkane...@juniper.net>>, 
> "Shraddha Hegde"
> |      <shrad...@juniper.net <mailto:shrad...@juniper.net>>, "Tony Li" 
> <tony...@tony.li <mailto:tony...@tony.li>>, "Tony Przygienda"
> |      <p...@juniper.net <mailto:p...@juniper.net>>
> | 
> |       
> | 
> |      A new version of I-D, draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-01.txt
> |      has been successfully submitted by Tony Li and posted to the
> |      IETF repository.
> | 
> |      Name:  draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv
> |      Revision:  01
> |      Title:  Multi-part TLVs in IS-IS
> |      Document date:  2022-07-04
> |      Group:  Individual Submission
> |      Pages:  7
> |      URL:
> |                 
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-01.txt
> |      Status:
> |              https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv/
> |      Htmlized:
> |            
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv
> |      Diff:
> |                
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-pkaneria-lsr-multi-tlv-01
> | 
> |      Abstract:
> |        New technologies are adding new information into IS-IS while
> |        deployment scales are simultaneously increasing, causing the contents
> |        of many critical TLVs to exceed the currently supported limit of 255
> |        octets.  Extensions such as [RFC7356] require significant IS-IS
> |        changes that could help address the problem, but a less drastic
> |        solution would be beneficial.  This document codifies the common
> |        mechanism of extending the TLV content space through multiple TLVs.
> | 
> |      The IETF Secretariat
> | 
> |     
> | 
> |  
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> | 
> |  Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> |  pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez 
> recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> |  a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> |  Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
> falsifie. Merci.
> | 
> |  This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
> information that may be protected by law;
> |  they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> |  If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and 
> delete this message and its attachments.
> |  As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
> modified, changed or falsified.
> |  Thank you.
> 
> | _______________________________________________
> | Lsr mailing list
> | Lsr@ietf.org <mailto:Lsr@ietf.org>
> | https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr 
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org <mailto:Lsr@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr 
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to