I support progressing this draft.
IGP support for SRv6 is clearly needed. We already have IS-IS extensions
defined and WG work on that draft is already complete.
Having the equivalent functionality defined for OSPFv3 closes an obvious gap.
Les
From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2022 10:17 AM
To: lsr <lsr@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensi...@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPFv3 Extensions for SRv6" -
draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-06.txt (Corrected Address)
As promised in today’s LSR WG meeting, this begins a 3 week WG Last Call,
ending on August 19th, 2022, for draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions. The
extra week is to account for PIST (Post-IETF Stress Syndrome). The
corresponding IS-IS draft is already on the RFC Queue and there are
implementations.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions/
Thanks,
Acee & Chris
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
