Hi, I support WG LC. It is in good shape!
It might be a good idea to include some text (perhaps in the appendix) on why a new LSA is used for SRv6 Locator LSA. Any reviewer and future reader would wonder why this decison was made. BTW, do expand LSA on first use. Thanks! Dhruv On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 10:47 PM Acee Lindem (acee) <acee= 40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > As promised in today’s LSR WG meeting, this begins a 3 week WG Last Call, > ending on August 19th, 2022, for draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions. The > extra week is to account for PIST (Post-IETF Stress Syndrome). The > corresponding IS-IS draft is already on the RFC Queue and there are > implementations. > > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions/ > > > > > > Thanks, > > Acee & Chris > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
