V6 of the draft has been posted with the changes agreed upon w Alvaro. AFAIK all outstanding comments have been addressed - please let me know if any further changes are required.
Les > -----Original Message----- > From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsb...@cisco.com> > Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 10:42 AM > To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.i...@gmail.com>; The IESG <i...@ietf.org> > Cc: Paul Wouters <paul.wout...@aiven.io>; cho...@chopps.org; lsr- > cha...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316...@ietf.org; Eric Vyncke > (evyncke) > <evyn...@cisco.com>; lsr@ietf.org; Rob Wilton (rwilton) > <rwil...@cisco.com>; Lars Eggert <l...@eggert.org>; t...@ietf.org > Subject: RE: Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-04: > (with > DISCUSS) > > Alvaro - > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.i...@gmail.com> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 10:28 AM > > To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsb...@cisco.com>; The IESG > <i...@ietf.org> > > Cc: Paul Wouters <paul.wout...@aiven.io>; cho...@chopps.org; lsr- > > cha...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316...@ietf.org; Eric Vyncke > (evyncke) > > <evyn...@cisco.com>; lsr@ietf.org; Rob Wilton (rwilton) > > <rwil...@cisco.com>; Lars Eggert <l...@eggert.org>; t...@ietf.org > > Subject: RE: Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis-04: > (with > > DISCUSS) > > > > On September 26, 2022 at 5:17:12 PM, Les Ginsberg wrote: > > > > > > Les: > > > > The text you proposed is...ok. Just one minor comment: the router ID > > doesn't have to be "globally unique", just unique within the IS-IS > > domain. I'll clear my DISCUSS. > > [LES:] Thanx - I will correct the text before publishing. > > > > > > > I'm disappointed that the resulting recommendation is driven by legacy > > implementations. Requiring a specific value may not be the best > > answer in all cases (hence my original question), but making > > accommodations is not better. > > [LES:] Understood - but this should not be of great concern. So long as the > address used is unique/stable whether it matches the Router ID or not won’t > affect operation. > Would it have been simpler if we could have said "Use the value in > TLV134/140"? Absolutely - but another address with the same characteristics > will work just as well. > > Les > > > > > [I don't expect an answer; I'm just documenting my opinion for the > archive.] > > > > Thanks! > > > > Alvaro. _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
