Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-09: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # Éric Vyncke, INT AD, comments for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-09 CC @evyncke Thank you for the work put into this document. It is short, clear, and useful (hence my YES). Please find below some non-blocking COMMENT points (but replies would be appreciated even if only for my own education). Special thanks to Acee Lindem for the shepherd's detailed write-up including the WG consensus and the justification of the intended status. I hope that this review helps to improve the document, Regards, -éric ## COMMENTS ### Section 3 Suggest to move section 3 (Local Interface IPv4 Address TLV) as a subsection of section 4.1 (OSPFv3 IPv4 Address-Family Specifics) as, at least for me, the reader cannot understand the use of section 3 before reading section 4.1 As I am not an OSPFv3 expert, the following question is possibly irrelevant, but can the IPv4 address be a link-local (i.e., 169.254/16)? ### Section 4.1 ``` ... In most deployments of OSPFv3 IPv4 AF, it is required that BFD is used to monitor and verify IPv4 data plane connectivity between the routers on the link and, hence, the BFD session is setup using IPv4 neighbor addresses. ``` The text is a little unclear whether an IPv6 BFD session is also required. ## Notes This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF], You can use the [`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into individual GitHub issues. [ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md [ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
