Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> writes:
Why did we explicitly define multi-part TLVs?
I offer this as an answer to my own question: We have the standard (RFC5303) which defined sub-tlvs in IS-IS, and says this in "3. The Extended IS Reachability TLV" "There is no defined mechanism for extending the sub-TLV space. Thus, wasting sub-TLV space is discouraged." Thanks, Chris. [as wg-member] _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr