Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-reverse-metric/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Apologies for being late to the party. Just a few things to add beyond the feedback my colleagues have already provided: The first sentence in Section 2.2 uses the phrase "toward the core" three times. Seems like it could do with some common factoring. There's a SHOULD at the bottom of Section 6. Why's it only a SHOULD? When might an implementer legitimately decide to do something else? In Section 9, I suggest making it explicit that you're talking about the "Link Local Signalling TLV Identifiers" registry in the "Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) Link Local Signalling (LLS) - Type/Length/Value Identifiers (TLV)" registry group. _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
