Hi Les, My bad, I missed that paragraph when reviewing diff - despite explicitly looking for it.
Yes, what you have in -04 looks good to me. Regards, Rob > -----Original Message----- > From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsb...@cisco.com> > Sent: 25 May 2023 15:37 > To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwil...@cisco.com>; The IESG <i...@ietf.org> > Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920...@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; > cho...@chopps.org > Subject: RE: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis-04: > (with COMMENT) > > Rob - > > Thanx for the review. > Yes, the update to the Introduction was done in response to Warren's > comment. Some offline discussion resulted in adding this to the Introduction > rather than the Abstract. > > Les > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> > > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 1:13 AM > > To: The IESG <i...@ietf.org> > > Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920...@ietf.org; lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; > > cho...@chopps.org; cho...@chopps.org > > Subject: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis-04: (with > > COMMENT) > > > > Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis-04: No Objection > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > > > Please refer to > > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot- > > positions/ > > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT > positions. > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis/ > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Thanks for this update. > > > > I reviewed the diff for -04, and then saw Warren's ballot comment against - > 02. > > I don't know if the intent is that Warren's comment has already been > > addressed, > > but I would give a +1 to a sentence in the introduction briefly explaining > the > > update and forward referencing section 15. > > > > Regards, > > Rob > > > > _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
