Hi John, Thanks for your review and we've fixed the nit that you point out in the latest version posted: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-12
Thanks, Ketan On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 7:09 PM John Scudder via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-11: Yes > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I just realized that the document talks about "LSA ID" and as far as I can > tell, this is not a term that is defined in the OSPF document set. If it > is a > well-defined term, can you please point me to what RFC defines it? Right > now, > it looks to me as though you should be talking about 'Link State ID > (Instance > ID)' for consistency with RFC 7770 §2.2. > > > >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
