Hi Paul, Thanks for the discussion and feedback. I've fixed the nit in my edit buffer and it will get reflected in the next update (if one is needed to address further comments).
Thanks, Ketan On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 9:07 PM Paul Wouters via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions-14: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks to Ketan for the constructive discussion and changes. I've updated > my > ballot to No Objection. I do hope the WG will consider properly replacing > or > updating RFC5340, but that is not this document's problem. > > NIT: IPSec -> IPsec (no need for new draft, it can be fixed during the RFC > editing cycle) > > > >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
