Hi Tom, Thanks for the review.
> On Aug 21, 2023, at 06:57, tom petch <ie...@btconnect.com> wrote: > > From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Christian Hopps > <cho...@chopps.org> > Sent: 19 August 2023 01:26 > > This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending Sep 1, 2023, for: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang/ > > <tp> > Some stray thoughts from a quick look at -22 > > ** It is an augmentation of the OSPF base model provided support for > perhaps provides > > /ospf:ospfv3/ospf:body: > I have forgotten what that final colon does but it is not in the YANG > > OLD > | +--ro prefix-options > | | +--ro prefix-options* identityref > NEW > | +--ro prefix-options > | | +--ro prefix-option* identityref > might be clearer with the singular This is a leaf-list of options. One can debate whether it would be cleaner if it were singular. However, this is moot point as this is from RFC 9129. > > identity ospfv3-e-inter-area-router-lsa { > ... > reference > "RFC 8362: OSPFv3 Link State Advertisement (LSA) > Extensibility, Section 4.3"; > Section 4.4 I think > I have not checked to see which section the data objects relate to Fixed. > > description > "Intra-Area Prefix TLV Grouping"; > reference > "RFC 8362: OSPFv3 Link State Advertisement (LSA) > Extensibility, Section 3.4"; > Section 3.7 I think > I have not checked to see which section the data objects relate to Fixed. > > reference > "RFC 8362: OSPFv3 Link State Advertisement (LSA) > Extensibility, Appendix B - AreaExtendedLSASupport"; > (twice) > Appendix B is Area Configuration Parameters Fixed. Thanks, Acee > > Tom Petch > > Authors, > > Please indicate to the list, your knowledge of any IPR related to this work. > > Thanks, > Chris. > _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
