Object its adoption. The reasons are the followings: 1) It is not the initial draft to describe the problem and provide the solution. 2) The problem and the explicit signaling mechanism is firstly provided by https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement/ in its 00 version(October,2019), far earlier than the current proposal and its 00 version(March, 2022). 3) Even after the proposed draft adopt the explicit signaling mechanism, it still lacks other mechanisms that can cover more prefixes unreachable scenarios, as stated in the https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement/
The LSR WG should consider to adopt the more comprehensive and simple solution, not the partial and complex design. Best Regards Aijun Wang China Telecom -----邮件原件----- 发件人: lsr-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Acee Lindem 发送时间: 2023年8月24日 4:07 收件人: lsr <lsr@ietf.org> 抄送: draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-annou...@ietf.org 主题: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption of "IGP Unreachable Prefix Announcement" - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-04 (Fixed draft name) LSR Working Group, This begins the working group adoption call for “IGP Unreachable Prefix Announcement” - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-announce-04. Please indicate your support or objection on this list prior to September 7th, 2023. Thanks, Acee _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
