Without commenting on the other aspects,

> On Sep 20, 2023, at 3:34 PM, Tony Przygienda <tonysi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 3. the MTU "largest datagram" needs to be errate'd to something more precise 
> on top.

Generally, errata are not the right way to fix “this is underspecified” kinds 
of problems. The right way is to do a bis or an update. See also 
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/processing-errata-ietf-stream/

—John
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to