Hello,
I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft.
The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related
drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and
sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide
assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing
Directorate, please see https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/rtg/RtgDir
Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it
would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF
Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through
discussion or by updating the draft.
Document: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding (the current version is -05)
Reviewer: Loa Andersson
Review Date: 2023-10-08
IETF LC End Date:
Intended Status: Experimental
Summary:
This document is basically ready for publication; I only found one issue
- the number of authors listed.
Document Overview:
Current Link State Protocol Data Unit (PDU) flooding rates are much
slower than what modern networks can support. The use of IS-IS at
larger scale requires faster flooding rates to achieve desired
convergence goals. This document discusses the need for faster
flooding, the issues around faster flooding, and some example approaches
to achieve faster flooding. It also defines protocol extensions
relevant to faster flooding.
Comments:
The draft is well-written and easy to read. I gone over the IANA
Considerations and allocations, and not found anything that need to be
addressed.
Major Issues:
Number of authors: There are 7 authors, that is more the the "allowed" 5
authors.
I have no background why there 7 authors listed, this has to be
addressed in some way:
- reduce the number of authors to five
- keep the number of authors at seven, and the Shepherd will have to
address this in the SWU,
I have put this as a "major issue" since I don't know where to put it.
My personal opinion is that anyone that has contributed text to the
document, and participated in the authors discussions, should be listed
as an author.
"No minor issues found."
Nits:
The nits-tool only finds a Miscellaneous warning:
-- The document date (5 September 2023) is 32 days in the past. Is this
intentional?
This warning is a bit annoying since it is impossible to avoid.
I have not found any other nits.
/Loa
--
Loa Andersson email: l...@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert loa.pi...@gmail.com
Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
