Hi, This version addresses the comments from the IESG review.
Other comments? Regards, Tony > Begin forwarded message: > > From: internet-dra...@ietf.org > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-11.txt > Date: January 9, 2024 at 3:32:24 PM PST > To: "Gyan S. Mishra" <gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com>, "Gyan Mishra" > <gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com>, "Sarah Chen" <sarahc...@arista.com>, "Tony Li" > <tony...@tony.li>, "Vivek Ilangovan" <ilango...@arista.com> > > A new version of Internet-Draft draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-11.txt has been > successfully submitted by Tony Li and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy > Revision: 11 > Title: Area Proxy for IS-IS > Date: 2024-01-09 > Group: lsr > Pages: 20 > URL: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-11.txt > Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy/ > HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy > Diff: > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-11 > > Abstract: > > Link state routing protocols have hierarchical abstraction already > built into them. However, when lower levels are used for transit, > they must expose their internal topologies to each other, leading to > scale issues. > > To avoid this, this document discusses extensions to the IS-IS > routing protocol that allow level 1 areas to provide transit, yet > only inject an abstraction of the level 1 topology into level 2. > Each level 1 area is represented as a single level 2 node, thereby > enabling greater scale. > > > > The IETF Secretariat > >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr