Speaking as WG member: I support working group adoption.
It would be good to add: 1. In the introduction, informational references to OSPFv3 [RFC9513] and ISIS [9352]. 2. The example use cases for the prefix Anycast flag we've been discussing. Note that we already have this flag for OSPFv3 and IS-IS and implementations are making use of it. That ship has left the dock and now is the time to question whether the use cases could be solved in a different manner. Those questioning the flag should have been paying attention when RFC 9513 and RFC 9352 were being discussed. Thanks, Acee > On Mar 19, 2024, at 2:43 PM, Acee Lindem <acee.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > This starts the Working Group adoption call for draft-chen-lsr-anycast-flag. > This is a simple OSPFv2 maintenance draft adding an Anycast flag for IPv4 > prefixes to align with IS-IS and OSPFv3. > > Please send your support or objection to this list before April 6th, 2024. > > Thanks, > Acee > > _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
